« ~newsforge: Google introduces video search service | Main | ~BBC: Middle East editorials about Iraqi elections »
January 29, 2005
~slashdot: This guys nails it on the head
Microsoft Claims Linux Security a Myth
Who is accountable for Windows? (Score:5, Insightful)
by nharmon (97591)on Saturday January 29, @08:40AM (#11513727)
(http://www.harmontek.com/)
From Windows XP's EULA:LIMITATION ON REMEDIES; NO CONSEQUENTIAL
OR OTHER DAMAGES. Your exclusive remedy for any breach
of this Limited Warranty is as set forth below. Except
for any refund elected by Microsoft, YOU ARE NOT ENTITLED
TO ANY DAMAGES, INCLUDING BUT NOT
LIMITED TO CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES, if
the Product does not meet Microsoft's Limited Warranty,
So, are we believe that if Windows crashes my data, that I can hold Microsoft accountable?At least with Linux I have access to the source code, and can hire programmers to scratch my itches for me. Somehow, I don't think microsoft would give out source code if they went under.
Posted by cystdog at January 29, 2005 09:15 AM
Trackback Pings
For trackbacks, please use this URL:
http://www.scupper.net/cgi-bin/mt-tb.cgi/70
